Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
So for those of you in the U.S.A, game companies are about to face a law that will would change the entire industry.
Recently, a U.S senator has proposed a bill to ban lootboxes, pay to win features and microtransactions in games that are under 18. The reason for the ban is that the business model is considered to be "gambling", cashing in on money to obtain some random premium game item or boost a level. Since minors play games with that kind of system, it is deemed harmful to them. Its apparent that big game companies have recently been very predatory in their monetary practices to gamers and pushing to implement their system in their later titles.
If a law like this were to pass, then the gaming industry would be severely impacted. We would see the entire mobile games stores be cleansed of its game library for having games with monetary systems, we'd be back in the 2000s were monetising games weren't common. Any game with monetary system (that is under 17) wouldn't be made.
Kids begging parents for their parent's credit card to buy for some premium bucks or season pass happens in real life. I actually care about kids these days, and i really am in favour if this passes. It just makes gaming for minors safer (even though there might be some loopholes). The lack of microtransactions or forced monetisation would make games alot cleaner...
I could drone all about this but this thread isn't really about my side of the story so I would like to hear your side of the story. What you think about this bill? How would it really affect gaming? Is it for the better or worse?
Recently, a U.S senator has proposed a bill to ban lootboxes, pay to win features and microtransactions in games that are under 18. The reason for the ban is that the business model is considered to be "gambling", cashing in on money to obtain some random premium game item or boost a level. Since minors play games with that kind of system, it is deemed harmful to them. Its apparent that big game companies have recently been very predatory in their monetary practices to gamers and pushing to implement their system in their later titles.
If a law like this were to pass, then the gaming industry would be severely impacted. We would see the entire mobile games stores be cleansed of its game library for having games with monetary systems, we'd be back in the 2000s were monetising games weren't common. Any game with monetary system (that is under 17) wouldn't be made.
Kids begging parents for their parent's credit card to buy for some premium bucks or season pass happens in real life. I actually care about kids these days, and i really am in favour if this passes. It just makes gaming for minors safer (even though there might be some loopholes). The lack of microtransactions or forced monetisation would make games alot cleaner...
I could drone all about this but this thread isn't really about my side of the story so I would like to hear your side of the story. What you think about this bill? How would it really affect gaming? Is it for the better or worse?
Your average level designer who makes traditional levels in Megamaker.
Lastest level: Endurance run of challenge course 3
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9457
Lastest level: Endurance run of challenge course 3
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9457
- UlticraftMTT
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:15 am
- Location: The dwarf planet Eris
- Discord: MettatonEX#9160
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
I think it's for the better, especially so EA will be forced to stop being greedy, and Fortnite could become less addictive. However, i think developers are probably just going to remove the mandatory payment features instead of removing the games entirely.
Most DLC such as DLC Smash Bros. Fighters or Minecraft Skin Packs shouldn't be affected, since you don't need DLC to actually beat or play a game.
Most DLC such as DLC Smash Bros. Fighters or Minecraft Skin Packs shouldn't be affected, since you don't need DLC to actually beat or play a game.
creator of Mega Man Maker Plus, 1/2/9/10 SFX Mod, and the (other) Game Boy mod
currently playing modded terraria
bunby catcher and splash woman are here i repeat bunby catcher and splash woman are here
currently playing modded terraria
bunby catcher and splash woman are here i repeat bunby catcher and splash woman are here
- Royalguard
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:20 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Discord: RoyalGuard#1135
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
I don't live in the US, so this doesn't impact me (yet).
IMO, good riddance. Games that rely on gambling mechanics and predatory monetization elements have been a poison on the gaming industry for years, since the early days of mobile phone gaming, and had since spread and infected console gaming and PC gaming as well. Businesses should not have the right to psychologically manipulate their customers into giving them money, especially children or people with thinking or descision-making impairments, which could lead them to dangerous gambling habits in the future that could greatly damage their lives.
Sure, it can't be denied that there will be heavy consequences of taking away gambling mechanics and predatory monetization elements, as some gaming companies heavily rely on it to make money, or to even stay afloat at all. Profits will fall, shares will drop, jobs will be lost, some companies may even need to shut down completely.
It should be noted that gaming companies (such as EA, and some others) have abused the system so much, that they where the ones that brought it to various governmental bodies' attention. They where given various warning to properly regulate the practice or else they would personally intervene, only to be met with responses from various parties doubling down on their stance on keeping the practice as it currently was, so they only have their own greed to blame for governmental intervention.
IMO, good riddance. Games that rely on gambling mechanics and predatory monetization elements have been a poison on the gaming industry for years, since the early days of mobile phone gaming, and had since spread and infected console gaming and PC gaming as well. Businesses should not have the right to psychologically manipulate their customers into giving them money, especially children or people with thinking or descision-making impairments, which could lead them to dangerous gambling habits in the future that could greatly damage their lives.
Sure, it can't be denied that there will be heavy consequences of taking away gambling mechanics and predatory monetization elements, as some gaming companies heavily rely on it to make money, or to even stay afloat at all. Profits will fall, shares will drop, jobs will be lost, some companies may even need to shut down completely.
It should be noted that gaming companies (such as EA, and some others) have abused the system so much, that they where the ones that brought it to various governmental bodies' attention. They where given various warning to properly regulate the practice or else they would personally intervene, only to be met with responses from various parties doubling down on their stance on keeping the practice as it currently was, so they only have their own greed to blame for governmental intervention.
- Brazencoronet17
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2018 11:09 pm
- Location: On a collegits' shelf
- Discord: Gyro Man#5136
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
Mobile games will proably lose their free status then since the fact they can't live on their microtransaction profits then. Is the law passed yet or not?
I wonder what will happen to Fortnite
I wonder what will happen to Fortnite
i am no longer active 
bye
bye
- UlticraftMTT
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:15 am
- Location: The dwarf planet Eris
- Discord: MettatonEX#9160
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
A lot of mobile games, at least back a few years ago, lived off of ad revenue and not microtransactions. Angry Birds, Temple Run, and several other games did this back in the Early 10's.Brazencoronet17 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 8:52 pmMobile games will proably lose their free status then since the fact they can't live on their microtransaction profits then. Is the law passed yet or not?
I wonder what will happen to Fortnite
creator of Mega Man Maker Plus, 1/2/9/10 SFX Mod, and the (other) Game Boy mod
currently playing modded terraria
bunby catcher and splash woman are here i repeat bunby catcher and splash woman are here
currently playing modded terraria
bunby catcher and splash woman are here i repeat bunby catcher and splash woman are here
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
UlticraftMTT wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 1:17 amA lot of mobile games, at least back a few years ago, lived off of ad revenue and not microtransactions. Angry Birds, Temple Run, and several other games did this back in the Early 10's.Brazencoronet17 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 8:52 pmMobile games will proably lose their free status then since the fact they can't live on their microtransaction profits then. Is the law passed yet or not?
I wonder what will happen to Fortnite
So now if they can't monetise games anymore because of the law, i guess now they probably have to put ads in their game that somehow relate...
They've gotta make money somehow if that bill were to pass.
(Now i have second thoughts about this bill passing)
Your average level designer who makes traditional levels in Megamaker.
Lastest level: Endurance run of challenge course 3
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9457
Lastest level: Endurance run of challenge course 3
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9457
- BenPlusMM
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:21 pm
- Location: Stuck at Doom’s Gate
- Discord: https://discord.gg/a9XqaZ6 / Ben™ #6759
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
Advertisements are easy to avoid. Just put yourself on Airplane Mode and you're good to go. This puts mobile devs in a pickle that it inside a pickle jar filled with hot water, since that's a really heckin' easy workaround and that's a workaround for their only source of income.Mabrick wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 4:05 pmUlticraftMTT wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 1:17 amA lot of mobile games, at least back a few years ago, lived off of ad revenue and not microtransactions. Angry Birds, Temple Run, and several other games did this back in the Early 10's.Brazencoronet17 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 8:52 pmMobile games will proably lose their free status then since the fact they can't live on their microtransaction profits then. Is the law passed yet or not?
I wonder what will happen to Fortnite
So now if they can't monetise games anymore because of the law, i guess now they probably have to put ads in their game that somehow relate...
They've gotta make money somehow if that bill were to pass.
(Now i have second thoughts about this bill passing)
2018 was a great year
- Royalguard
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:20 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Discord: RoyalGuard#1135
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
Remember the days when game developers used to sell feature-complete games for a full retail price, and occasionally sold expansion packs that brought large amounts of additional content? The days where companies where successful based upon the quality of their products, and the trust they gained and maintained with their target demographic. I miss those days...
I'm not a fan of modern day gaming and its tendency to sell incomplete/broken games at full retail price, nickle and diming players for basic content and quality-of-life features that should have been in the game upon release, and selling DLC for over-inflated prices for such minimal amounts of content.
I'm not a fan of modern day gaming and its tendency to sell incomplete/broken games at full retail price, nickle and diming players for basic content and quality-of-life features that should have been in the game upon release, and selling DLC for over-inflated prices for such minimal amounts of content.
- Brazencoronet17
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2018 11:09 pm
- Location: On a collegits' shelf
- Discord: Gyro Man#5136
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
If a game is worth 60 dollars charge it 60 dollars.Royalguard wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 6:31 amRemember the days when game developers used to sell feature-complete games for a full retail price, and occasionally sold expansion packs that brought large amounts of additional content? The days where companies where successful based upon the quality of their products, and the trust they gained and maintained with their target demographic. I miss those days...
I'm not a fan of modern day gaming and its tendency to sell incomplete/broken games at full retail price, nickle and diming players for basic content and quality-of-life features that should have been in the game upon release, and selling DLC for over-inflated prices for such minimal amounts of content.
Not many games these days are worth 60 dollars.
Many games are still charged at 60 dollars.
i am no longer active 
bye
bye
- Gravitrax64
- Posts: 2355
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:55 am
- Location: SSSSPPPPAAAACCCCEEEE
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
I'm not sure if I like the sound of this bill. I mean I would LOVE to see games with little to no micro transactions, but then again this makes me wonder. If this bill passes would game developers be allowed to make any DLCs?BenPlusMM wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:46 amAdvertisements are easy to avoid. Just put yourself on Airplane Mode and you're good to go. This puts mobile devs in a pickle that it inside a pickle jar filled with hot water, since that's a really heckin' easy workaround and that's a workaround for their only source of income.Mabrick wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 4:05 pmUlticraftMTT wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 1:17 am
A lot of mobile games, at least back a few years ago, lived off of ad revenue and not microtransactions. Angry Birds, Temple Run, and several other games did this back in the Early 10's.
So now if they can't monetise games anymore because of the law, i guess now they probably have to put ads in their game that somehow relate...
They've gotta make money somehow if that bill were to pass.
(Now i have second thoughts about this bill passing)
I really needed to update my signature...


- UlticraftMTT
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:15 am
- Location: The dwarf planet Eris
- Discord: MettatonEX#9160
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
DLCs should be allowed, they usually don't hide crucial game features behind them. Even if the top tier character in, say a Smash Bros. game was DLC, you could still have a chance against the DLC character with a starter or unlockable character.Gravitrax64 wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 1:10 amI'm not sure if I like the sound of this bill. I mean I would LOVE to see games with little to no micro transactions, but then again this makes me wonder. If this bill passes would game developers be allowed to make any DLCs?BenPlusMM wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:46 amAdvertisements are easy to avoid. Just put yourself on Airplane Mode and you're good to go. This puts mobile devs in a pickle that it inside a pickle jar filled with hot water, since that's a really heckin' easy workaround and that's a workaround for their only source of income.
creator of Mega Man Maker Plus, 1/2/9/10 SFX Mod, and the (other) Game Boy mod
currently playing modded terraria
bunby catcher and splash woman are here i repeat bunby catcher and splash woman are here
currently playing modded terraria
bunby catcher and splash woman are here i repeat bunby catcher and splash woman are here
- Bean man
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:49 pm
- Location: Wherever you're hiding your beans
- Discord: Bean man#9687
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
Pay-to-win and and extra content are two different things.Gravitrax64 wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 1:10 amI'm not sure if I like the sound of this bill. I mean I would LOVE to see games with little to no micro transactions, but then again this makes me wonder. If this bill passes would game developers be allowed to make any DLCs?
Personally, I'm glad they proposed this. Too lazy to explain why, but to summarize I hope that this'll stop some companies from getting too greedy.

While I'd had some good experiences here, it's quite mortifying to reflect on how immensely immature I've acted in the past. Retaining this sentiment, I'll mostly remain inactive.
- Brazencoronet17
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2018 11:09 pm
- Location: On a collegits' shelf
- Discord: Gyro Man#5136
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
It's a mixed bag. Of course, modern gaming sucks nowadays mostly.
But this law could put so many companies in danger.
So one or the other: Company shutdowns or ending of corporate greed. What do you make of it?
But this law could put so many companies in danger.
So one or the other: Company shutdowns or ending of corporate greed. What do you make of it?
i am no longer active 
bye
bye
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
It would be mostly their fault for not listening to the community feedback enough or learn from previous mistakes. I don't think at this point these big companies might be worth saving if they keep doing this. If it passes, then the companies may try to find ways to get ideas from community, or just be resilient and fight back.Brazencoronet17 wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:02 pmIt's a mixed bag. Of course, modern gaming sucks nowadays mostly.
But this law could put so many companies in danger.
So one or the other: Company shutdowns or ending of corporate greed. What do you make of it?
The bill shouldn't pass too late, otherwise the game companies may be bankrupt by that time.
Your average level designer who makes traditional levels in Megamaker.
Lastest level: Endurance run of challenge course 3
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9457
Lastest level: Endurance run of challenge course 3
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9457
- Uranus
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:37 pm
- Location: Uranus, Solar System
- Discord: Uranus#7544
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
the companies in question should be well aware of this ban and should find different strategies to surviveMabrick wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2019 3:21 amIt would be mostly their fault for not listening to the community feedback enough or learn from previous mistakes. I don't think at this point these big companies might be worth saving if they keep doing this. If it passes, then the companies may try to find ways to get ideas from community, or just be resilient and fight back.Brazencoronet17 wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:02 pmIt's a mixed bag. Of course, modern gaming sucks nowadays mostly.
But this law could put so many companies in danger.
So one or the other: Company shutdowns or ending of corporate greed. What do you make of it?
The bill shouldn't pass too late, otherwise the game companies may be bankrupt by that time.
companies like EA likely would try to find a loophole so they can produce more money without any intervention with the government
companies like Nintendo aren't really effected since they usually have no in game currency and if they did, then they would know what they are doing
Mobile Games are going to be the most effected. since a majority of them have pay to win features, many games could struggle with their profit or survival
the definition of Gambling is
(gamble
/ˈɡamb(ə)l/
verb
gerund or present participle: gambling
1.
play games of chance for money; bet.
"he gambles on football"
synonyms: bet, wager, place a bet, lay a bet, stake money on something, back the horses, try one's luck on the horses; More
informalplay the ponies;
informalpunt, chance one's arm, have a flutter;
raregame
"I go to the races when I want to gamble"
•bet (a sum of money).
"they gambled their money on cards"
2.
take risky action in the hope of a desired result.
"he was gambling on the success of his satellite TV channel"
synonyms: take a chance, take a risk, take a leap in the dark, leave things to chance, speculate, venture, buy a pig in a poke;)
Uranus is finally back. Message me on Discord if you have any issues with the forums or the wiki. Or contact the other mods if I'm not active.
JOIN THE UNITED CORPARATIONS TODAY!!

pm me to do so
JOIN THE UNITED CORPARATIONS TODAY!!

pm me to do so
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
Lootboxes are gambling, but microtransactions on their own are not gambling. When they show you what you're buying, you know what you're paying for.
I do things.
It's been a while. I think it's about time I made my return.
It's been a while. I think it's about time I made my return.
- Diamond Wolf
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2017 6:48 am
- Location: Kimse Neua, Deimos
- Discord: Diamond_Miner33#9310
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
But you always win with lootboxes.
(Playing devil's advocate here)
(Playing devil's advocate here)
- Royalguard
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:20 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Discord: RoyalGuard#1135
Re: Discussion: The ban on lootboxes and microtransactions.
While, yes, microtransactions are not always gambling, they still have the potiental to be equally as malicious and psychologically manipulative, regardless if they are lootboxes or not. Microtransations in general I feel need better regulation, the laws have been far behind on these concepts for way too long now.
(This coming from someone who works in the field of marketing themselves.)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests